Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:09]

CALL TO

[1. Call to Order]

ORDER THE, UH, YORK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, UH, SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2023.

THE CODE OF VIRGINIA REQUIRES, UH, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO HAVE A PLANNING COMMISSION, THE PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO ADVISE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON LAND USE AND PLANNING ISSUES AFFECTING THE COUNTY.

THE RESPONSIBILITY IS EXERCISED THROUGH RECOMMENDATIONS CONVEYED BY RESOLUTIONS OR OTHER OFFICIAL MEANS, UH, AND ALL ARE MATTERS OF PUBLIC RECORD.

THE COMMISSION IS COMPRISED OF SEVEN CITIZEN VOLUNTEERS APPOINTED BY THE BOARD, ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH VOTING DISTRICT, AND TWO AT LARGE MEMBERS.

MADAM SECRETARY, CALL PLEASE.

MR. HOY.

HERE.

MR. TITUS? HERE.

MS. ALITO? HERE.

MR. KING? HERE.

MR. KRINER? HERE.

MR. SMITH.

HERE.

MR. WAS MARTIN? HERE.

MR. CHAIRMAN, YOU HAVE A FORUM.

ALL RIGHT.

MR. STAND FOR PLEDGE RELATIONS, PLEASE.

TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.

ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

OKAY.

UH, MOVING TO

[4. Approve Minutes - August 9, 2023 ]

OUR LAST MEETING MINUTES.

UM, EVERYONE HAS A COPY.

ANY COMMENTS? REQUEST FOR CHANGES FROM ANYONE? UH, HAVING HEARD NONE, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.

I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN.

THE MOTION BY MR. ROY IS TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON AUGUST 9TH, 2023.

MR. ROY? YES.

MR. TITUS? YES.

MS. HAM? YES.

MR. KING? YES.

MR. KRINER? YES.

MR. WAER? YES.

MR. SMITH? YES.

THE MOTION PASSES.

OKAY.

UH, AT THIS TIME WE WILL, UM, OPEN THE, UH, FLOOR FOR

[5. Citizen Comments]

CITIZEN COMMENT, PERIOD.

UH, THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY ISSUE THAT IS NOT ON TONIGHT'S AGENDA.

UH, AND I'LL REMIND YOU THAT WE HAVE ONE ITEM, UH, ON THE AGENDA.

AND THE SECOND ITEM IS FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UH, WHICH WILL NOT HAVE A, UH, UH, PUBLIC FORUM.

SO THIS WOULD BE YOUR OPPORTUNITY.

UH, DO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK BEFORE WE BEGIN OUR PROCEEDINGS? OKAY.

WAIT.

OKAY.

I'M SORRY.

GO AHEAD.

THESE ARE FOR THE OPEN.

THOSE ARE PEOPLE WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.

THOSE PEOPLE WHO SIGNED UP FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? NO, NO, NO.

FOR THE SPEAKER CITIZEN COMMENT.

OH, THE CITIZEN COMMENT.

OKAY.

I'VE GOT, UH, MARIE REBEL, AND I'LL ASK YOU TO, UH, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOUR LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES, AND THE LIGHT WILL TURN YELLOW, INDICATING THAT YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS TO WRAP UP AND READ THE END.

YES.

MY NAME IS MAURICE REBEL.

I LIVE AT TWO OF ZERO FIVE SHADY BLUFF POINT, WILLIAMSBURG.

ON AUGUST 9TH, 2023, THE FOLLOWING CITIZENS SPOKE OF CONCERNS ABOUT THE CURRENT DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DALILA JOHNSON, TOM CHAMBERLAIN, RICHARD HOWELL, STEPHEN KENNEDY, DONNA JEER, TERRY HODSON, ELIZABETH WILKINS, JACQUES FR, RON REBEL, AND BOB HODSON.

THESE CITIZENS WERE ENGAGED, INFORMED, AND SOUGHT ONLY TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE OUR COMMUNITIES.

WHY THEN WERE THEY MET WITH A STAFF RESPONSE THAT WAS ARGUMENTATIVE, DEFENSIVE, AND FAILED TO INCLUDE SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES TO ADDRESS THEIR CONCERNS.

FOR SOME REASON, STAFF IS RUSHING THIS APPROVAL.

WHY? TOPICS ADDRESSED AT THE MEETING WERE OVERDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, SHORT-TERM RENTALS, CONSERVATION, AND THE PRINCESS CRUISE LINES STAFF'S MEMORANDUM IGNORED THE VAST MAJORITY OF CITIZEN CONCERNS AND SUGGESTIONS, INSTEAD, PORTRAYING CITIZEN SPEAKERS AS UNINFORMED OR MISINFORMED.

THIS HAS BEEN A GO-TO TACTIC FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S LEADERSHIP, AND SADLY, THEY ALWAYS SEEM TO GET THE LAST WORD.

WELL, HOPEFULLY NOT TONIGHT.

IN THE COMING WEEKS, THIS PLANNING COMMISSION NEEDS TO CHALLENGE BIAS AND HUBRIS IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIVELY ADDRESS THE ABSENCE OF CITIZEN SUBSTANTIVE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE DRAFT, UNRESOLVED FLAWS IN THE PLAN TO INCLUDE INSUFFICIENT INCLUSION OF CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING CRUISE SHIPS.

INSUFFICIENT

[00:05:01]

RECOGNITION OF THE EFFECTS OF OVERDEVELOPMENT IN YOUR COUNTY.

NO PROGRESS ON THE REQUIREMENTS FOR S STR AND LINGERING LIP SERVICE TO CONSERVATION, CONTINUED USE OF OBSOLETE DATA, LACK OF PERFORMANCE METRICS, LACK OF OVERALL VISION.

THE DRAFTING OF THIS PLAN HAS BEEN YEARS IN THE MAKING, BUT SUDDENLY THERE IS A RUSH TO APPROVAL FLAWS AND ALL.

AGAIN, I ASK WHY.

PLEASE SHOW THE COURAGE TO SLOW THIS APPROVAL PROCESS, MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES, AND ULTIMATELY PRESENT OUR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND CITIZENS WITH THE BEST PRODUCT POSSIBLE AND A PRODUCT WE ARE ALL PROUD TO SUPPORT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

UH, STEVEN KENNEDY.

UH, GOOD EVENING.

UH, STEVEN KENNEDY, 1 0 4 PENN DRIVE.

ALSO VICE PRESIDENT OF THE CONSERVE YORK COUNTY FOUNDATION.

UH, GO TO CONSERVE YORK COUNTY.ORG.

THAT'S CONSERVE YOUR COUNTY.ORG.

TONIGHT'S COMMENTS SUMMARIZING MY COMMENTS FROM OUR LAST CHITCHAT ON AUGUST 9TH.

YOUR MINUTES ARE WRONG.

THEY'RE INACCURATE, SQUELCHING AND DILUTING MY MESSAGE.

WORDS MEAN THINGS, LADY AND GENTLEMEN, ESPECIALLY IN AN ELECTION YEAR.

THESE PURPOSEFUL OMISSIONS, UH, ERODE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE.

HAVING SAT ON MANY BOARDS, BOTH FOR-PROFIT AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT, WAS ALWAYS TAUGHT AS A WALL STREET INTERN.

DON'T LET THEM, OR THE COMMITTEE OF THEY, UH, PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH.

WORDS, DON'T LET THEM DELETE WORDS, COUNSELOR OR ALTER YOUR VIEWS BEFORE APPROVING THOSE MINUTES.

YOU PUBLISHED MY CHAT WITH 317 WORDS.

THERE WAS, I HAD IT TRANSCRIBED.

DON'T WORRY, I WON'T CHARGE YOU FOR IT'S 846 WORDS.

I'D LIKE EACH OF YOU TO TAKE THIS HOME WITH YOU AND SAY, WHICH ONE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE OTHER, WHICH MESSAGE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THE ONE THAT I ACTUALLY GAVE YOU? NEXT ITEM, WALT REBA'S RETIRING.

CHAD GREEN IS MOVING ON.

SPEAKING OF MR. GREEN, YOU MENTIONED HIS NAME IS A JUSTIFICATION OF FORCED PASSAGE OF THIS DISASTROUS 2040 COMP PLAN, 2019 DATA, 2020 CRIME STATS.

HAS ANYTHING CHANGED SINCE C O CRIME IN YORK COUNTY? I CALL IT OLD NEWS.

I CALL IT S O S, SYMBOLISM OVER SUBSTANCE.

SO IF WE'RE GONNA QUOTE MR. GREEN, THEN HOW ABOUT REGARDING SHORT-TERM RENTALS OR ST QUOTE, RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES ARE FOR HOMES, NOT HOTELS.

IT SAYS, MR. GREEN.

SO HERE YOU GO.

HERE'S YOUR POLICY.

READY.

ZERO, NONE, PERIOD.

GRANDFATHER, THE ONES THAT ALREADY OWN SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

YOU CANNOT REDUCE THE CAPITAL STOCK OF A NATION.

YOU CANNOT REDUCE THE CAPITAL STOCK OF YOUR COUNTY BECAUSE AND EXPECT PRICES TO WORK FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS.

THE IRREFUTABLE LAW OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND IS STILL ALIVE AND WELL IN YORK COUNTY.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LLCS COME IN AND BUY UP DOZENS OF LOW PRICE POINT HOMES IN YORK COUNTY BECAUSE OF ERRONEOUS POLICIES? YOU ALSO MUST PRODUCE FULL DISCLOSURE, PLEASE, TO THE CITIZEN OWNER.

HOW MANY OF YOU OWN SHORT-TERM RENTALS, WHETHER HERE OR ELSEWHERE? PLEASE PRODUCE OR DISQUALIFY YOURSELVES FROM MAKING POLICY ON THAT ISSUE.

I HAD A CLIENT RUN AN AI PROGRAM ON SDRS THAT IN LESS THAN 90 SECONDS, CREATED A POLICY FOR YOUR COUNTY.

I WON'T CHARGE YOU FOR THAT.

IN THE MEANTIME, BEFORE THE ROBOTS, UH, RENDER US ALL OBSOLETE, WE HAVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS FROM THE CONSERVE YOUR COUNTY FOUNDATION THAT CAN PRODUCE A WHITE PAPER.

THEY CAN TEACH A MATCH FOR CLASS ON THE TOPIC.

AND ALL YOU DO IS IGNORE THEM, DISMISS THEM.

THE CONDESCENSION IS REALLY STRONG.

NOT SURE IF THAT'S BECAUSE OF YEARS OF SERVICE OR SOME OTHER REASON, BUT THIS IS A GOOD REMINDER.

YOUR PUBLIC SERVANTS, NOT THE PUBLIC MASTERS.

SO I'M RUNNING MY OWN TIME CLOCK BECAUSE YOU MAKE PEOPLE, UM, AND I WILL TOP THERE THAT, UH, I RAN MY OWN TIME CLOCK.

I THINK YOU NEED TO RECALIBRATE THAT.

I THINK YOU'RE ALL BY AT LEAST SIX SECONDS.

AND THE LAST THING I DID FOR YOUR RATIFICATION IS I'VE BEEN TAPING THIS SO I CAN SEND YOU THE MINUTES.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE STAFF DO IT.

I HEAR THE STAFF IS WAY OVERWORKED.

I'M VERY SORRY ABOUT THAT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, SIR.

YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME.

I'LL SEND THAT TO YOU AND SAVE YOU SOME TIME, MR. SMITH.

THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

GOOD NIGHT.

NOW, UH, NEXT STEP.

UH, BETSY TAYLOR.

PARDON ME.

EXCUSE ME.

THANK YOU.

[00:10:01]

BETSY TAYLOR, ONE 11 KISKI WATCH YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA.

I REFER YOU TO PAGE EIGHT OF THE REPORT, THE LAST SENTENCE UNDER STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO PROMOTE AND INCREASE YEAR-ROUND VISITATION TO YORKTOWN AND RIVER WALK LANDING IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE VILLAGE'S HISTORIC CHARM AND CHARACTER AND RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENCE QUALITY OF LIFE.

WHAT'S MISSING? THERE'S SOMETHING MISSING THERE.

BAR HARBOR, AMSTERDAM, KEY WEST, VENICE, ISTANBUL, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, HAVE INVESTED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN REPORTS, STUDIES ON THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF CRUISE SHIPS AND THEIR HARBORS.

THE PORT OF SAVANNAH, GEORGIA, AFTER THIS, THIS IS 10 YEARS AGO AFTER AN EXTENSIVE STUDY FLAT OUT, SAID, NO, WE ARE NOT GOING TO SUBJECT OUR PORT OUR CITIZENS TO THIS.

SO YES, WE WANT TO PRESERVE THE HISTORIC QUALITY.

THIS AREA IS A TREASURE FOR OUR COUNTY, OUR STATE, AND OUR NATION.

THERE'S NO PLACE ELSE LIKE IT IN THE WORLD.

SO I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE WORDS FOLLOWING THAT WILL NOT ADD, DETRACT FROM THE VILLAGE'S, HISTORIC CHARM, CHARACTER AND RESIDENCE, QUALITY OF LIFE.

I REQUEST THE WORDS OR ADVERSELY IMPACT THE COMMON, THE, UM, NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE ECOSYSTEM OF THE RIVER AND AIR QUALITY.

THERE'S BEEN NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THESE CRUISE SHIPS IN YORKTOWN OR YORK COUNTY, I SHOULD SAY, BECAUSE IT'S NOT JUST YORK VILLAGE.

THAT RIVER FLOWS BACK AND FORTH ANY POLLUTION THAT'S RELEASED, ANY FUMES THAT ARE RELEASED, AIR QUALITY AND WATER.

AND I THINK BEFORE WE LIMIT IT JUST TO THE HISTORIC VALUE, WE HAVE GOT TO MAKE AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON OUR ENVIRONMENT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

UH, NEXT I HAVE, UH, JACQUES MONTE FRANZ, UH, GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

MY NAME IS JACQUE MONTE FRANZ.

I LIVE AT 2 28 CHURCH STREET.

JUST RECENTLY WE HAD A MEETING WITH, UH, THE WATERMAN'S MUSEUM.

AND AT THAT MEETING WE WERE SHOWN FOUR CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS OF WHAT THE MUSEUM COMPLEX MIGHT LOOK LIKE.

AND IT INCLUDED A, AN ILLUSTRATION OF A LARGE CONCRETE, UH, TENDER PIER FOR HOUSING TENDER SHIPS.

THAT PIER CURVED UP RIVER OBLITERATED THE VIEW OF ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE ENJOYING THE POCKET BEACHES IN THAT AREA.

PICNICKING THERE IS ALSO GONNA OBSTRUCT THE ENTIRE VIEW OF ANYBODY COMING INTO TOWN ON WATER STREET.

IT'LL BE THE DOMINANT VIEW THAT THEY HAVE.

I URGE YOU ALL, IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THESE DRAWINGS, TO ASK THE WATERMAN'S MUSEUM TO SEE THEM, THEY'RE RATHER ENLIGHTENING.

A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THE ONE OF THE TENDER PIER ILLUSTRATIONS SHOW DEPICTS A LARGE BUILDING ON THE SQUARE SECTION OF THE TENDER PIER, WHICH HOUSES A, UH, AN EDUCATIONAL BUILDING FOR THE WATER MUSEUM.

THAT'S A WONDERFUL THING, BUT IF YOU LOOK MORE CLOSELY, THERE ARE ALL THESE LITTLE KIOSK TYPE STRUCTURES AROUND THAT BUILDING, AND WE ANTICIPATE THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE USED TO FOR BY PRINCESS CRUISE LINES TO SELL TRINKETS AND SOUVENIRS TO THE TOURISTS COMING OFF THOSE SHIPS AND CAPTURE THAT MONEY BEFORE IT EVER GETS TO THE VENDORS IN TOWN.

THAT'S A TYPICAL, UH, PAT PATTERN OF ACTIVITY THAT THESE CRUISE LINES USE ALL OVER THE WORLD.

AND IT RE REMOVES A LOT OF THE INCOME THAT INITIALLY COMES INTO TOWN DURING THE PILOT PROGRAM FROM THOSE VENDORS LATER ON.

THIS IS A LONG-TERM HORIZON THAT PRINCESS CRUISE LINES IS LOOKING AT.

AND KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMPANY IS AT A $12.2 BILLION COMPANY.

THEY TRADE ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE EXCHANGE.

THE PRIMARY MISSION OF THE C E O OF THAT COMPANIES IS TO LOOK OUT FOR THEIR SHAREHOLDERS, NOT TO LOOK OUT FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTY.

SO, IN SUMMARY, I JUST WANT TO REQUEST THAT YOU REMOVE ANY REFERENCE TO PRINCE'S CRUISE LINES FROM YOUR DOCUMENT THIS EVENING.

UH, WE HAVE NEVER HAD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ISSUE.

EVERYTHING'S BEEN DONE, UH, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AND IN SECRET

[00:15:01]

UNTIL RECENTLY WHEN THE MUSEUM OFFERED TO SHARE SOME OF THEIR INFORMATION WITH US THAT WE WERE VERY GRATEFUL FOR.

SO BEFORE YOU INCLUDE ANY MENTION OF THIS IN YOUR DOCUMENTS, WE URGE YOU TO THINK TWICE.

TAKE A LOOK AT THOSE ILLUSTRATIONS THERE.

I'M SURE THEY WOULD MAKE THEM A AVAIL AVAILABLE TO YOU AND, AND TAKE A HARD LOOK AND, AND, YOU KNOW, JUST DON'T TAKE FOR GRANTED THAT THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF CRUISE SHIP PRESENCE IS GONNA BE GOOD FOR THE COUNTY 'CAUSE WE DON'T THINK IT IS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, SIR.

UH, NEXT I HAVE ELIZABETH WILKINS.

GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME IS ELIZABETH WILKINS, 2 28 CHURCH STREET.

UM, GOOD EVENING PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS.

I'D LIKE TO RECOMMEND THAT INSTEAD OF USING MORE PALATABLE AND VAGUE LANGUAGE TO DESCRIBE IT, THAT ALL MENTION OF PRINCESS CRUISE LINES BE REMOVED FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

EXCUSE ME, A MA'AM, CAN YOU MOVE YOUR MICROPHONE OVER TO OH, YES.

THANK YOU.

WE ARE CONSISTENTLY ASSURED THAT NO DECISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, NO FINAL DECISIONS, NO AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN SIGNED AD NAUSEUM.

SO IF THAT'S THE CASE, AND THIS IS JUST A TRIAL, ALBEIT FOR TWO YEARS, NOT ONE, THERE IS NO REASON TO HARDEN PRINCESS INTO YOUR DOCUMENT RIGHT NOW.

WELL OVER 5,000 PEOPLE HAVE SIGNED OUR PETITION TO PRESERVE YORKTOWN WITHOUT LARGE CRUISE SHIPS AND THEIR INEVITABLE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL IMPACTS.

WE ASK THAT YOU STEP BACK, LISTEN TO CITIZENS AND OMIT PRINCESS FROM THE CURRENT PLAN.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

UM, THAT'S THE LAST, UH, SHEET THAT I HAVE.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE, UH, THAT WISHES TO SPEAK? PLEASE COME FORWARD.

THANK YOU.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.

YES, I'M BARBARA LUCK, 1 39 SMITH STREET.

UM, WHAT I'M GOING TO READ IS, UM, A COPY OF AN EMAIL SENT FROM PETER DEAN OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TO THE BOARD OF, TO OUR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGARDING THE PRINCESS PROJECT.

PLAIN, SIMPLE, AND TO THE POINT.

I'M GOING TO USE A METAPHOR WE ALL CAN UNDERSTAND TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE AT HAND IN A SMALL, QUIET, AND MOST IMPORTANT HISTORICAL AMERICAN SITE.

YORKTOWN BECOMING ONE MORE STOP FOR THE PRINCESS CRUISE LINE.

AND THE QUOTE HE GIVES IS ONE OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN'S.

WE WILL NOT APPRECIATE WATER UNTIL THE WELL RUNS DRY.

APPRECIATE YOUR SMALL GYM OF BEAUTY AND SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE.

YORKTOWN WILL BE SEVERELY NEGATIVELY COMPROMISED WITH THE INTRODUCTION TO YOUR LAND AND WATERSCAPE OF A VESSEL DESIGNED TO ENTERTAIN THE LARGEST NUMBER OF PAYING GUESTS POSSIBLE.

IT IS THE THE RARE AESTHETICS YORKTOWN OFFERS THAT WILL SUFFER THE CALM AND CONTEMPLATIVE SIGHT OF SO MUCH AMERICAN HISTORY AND NATURAL BEAUTY WILL BE LOST.

THE CRUISE LINE MIGHT FILL LOCAL COFFERS, BUT WHAT PRICE CAN BE PUT ON THE LOSS OF THE BEAUTY AND SERENITY NOW ENJOYED BY LOCAL RESIDENTS AND VISITORS ALIKE, PLEASE, AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LOOK INTO YOUR PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SENSIBILITIES TO SAVE WHAT LITTLE HAS NOT BEEN T TAINTED BY POOR PLANNING FOR CAPITAL GAIN.

GIVE MR. FRANKLIN'S QUOTE, SERIOUS CONTEMPLATION.

SINCERELY, PETER DEAN, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MA'AM.

UH, ANYONE ELSE? OH, YES MA'AM.

YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE? MY NAME'S TERRY HOTS AND I LIVE AT 2 0 7 NELSON STREET.

UM, I ALSO AGREE WITH THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE SPOKEN, UM, REGARDING THE PRINCESS CRUISE LINES.

UM, IT WOULD BE A VERY NEGATIVE THING TO HAVE THEM COME TO YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA.

UM, AND THE SADDEST PART IS THAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD TIME AND TIME AGAIN BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT THEY DON'T HAVE THE ANSWERS, THAT THEY DON'T HAVE INFORMATION ON THIS.

AND YET WE HAVE FOIA DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW, UM, THAT ON 1220 OF 22, A LETTER FROM SHEILA KNOWLES AND THOMAS SHEPHERD WAS WRITTEN, UH, TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO, UM, ACQUIRE $15 MILLION.

UM, SO I THINK THEY DID KNOW ABOUT WHAT WAS GOING ON.

I, UM, AND WE KNOW WE'VE GOT A CALENDAR THAT SHOWS

[00:20:01]

THE TIMELINE OF THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN TRANSPIRED JUST BY GETTING FOIA INFORMATION.

AND IT'S KIND OF DISHEARTENING BECAUSE THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY.

UM, SO AGAIN, I WOULD REQUEST THAT YOU PLEASE CONSIDER TAKING PRINCESS CRUISE LINES OUT OF, UH, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UM, BECAUSE IT HAS NO BUSINESS COMING HERE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU, MA'AM.

UH, ANYONE ELSE? ANY? OKAY.

THANK YOU ALL FOR PRESENTING YOUR COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, UH, FOR THE RECORD.

UH, AND AT THIS TIME WE'LL MOVE

[Application No. UP-1018-23, Michael Tyndall Enterprises, Inc.: Request for a Special Use Permit, pursuant to Section 24.1-306 (Category 15, No. 4b) of the York County Zoning Ordinance, to authorize the establishment of a contractor’s shop with outdoor/exposed storage on a 0.2-acre parcel (GPIN S04d-2937-0558) located at 2927 George Washington Memorial Highway (Route 17). The property is zoned GB (General Business) and is designated General Business in the Comprehensive Plan.]

TO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.

UH, STAFF WILL PROVIDE A PRESENTATION, UH, FOR COMMISSIONERS AND QUESTIONS.

ALRIGHTY FOLKS.

GOOD EVENING.

UH, TONIGHT WE'RE GONNA DISCUSS AN APPLICATION, UM, NUMBER U P 1 0 1 8 2 3.

AND THIS IS FOR A CONTRACTOR'S SHOP WITH OUTDOOR STORAGE AT 2 9 2 7 GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY.

SO, AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, UH, THE SUBJECT PARCEL IS HIGHLIGHTED IN PURPLE.

THAT'S THAT 29 27 GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY.

YOU'LL NOTICE THAT THE SURROUNDING PARCELS ARE ALL ZONE, GENERAL BUSINESS, UM, AND R 20.

HOWEVER, THEY ARE ALL DESIGNATED GENERAL BUSINESS IN THE COMP PLAN, INCLUDING THAT R 20 PARCEL IN THE REAR THERE.

AND THAT'S JUST AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL.

UM, I WOULD LIKE TO NOTE THAT THIS AERIAL IS FROM 2021 AND THE MATERIALS YOU SEE IN THE BACK THERE HAVE ACTUALLY MOSTLY BEEN REMOVED.

UM, SO WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT THAT THAT IS OUT A LITTLE BIT OUT OF DATE.

SO THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S SKETCH PLAN.

UM, YOU CAN SEE THERE, HE SHOWS HIS EXISTING BUILDING, UM, THAT IS 1496 SQUARE FEET AND IT'S AN EXISTING CONTRACTOR SHOP.

UM, APPLICANT HAS BEEN IN THAT BUILDING SINCE 2011 IN THE REAR.

THE APPLICANT ALSO SHOWS A 152 SQUARE FOOT CAR CONTAINER THAT IS ON SITE, AND THAT CONTAINS SOME MATERIALS.

AND THERE ARE ADDITIONAL KIND OF MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MATERIALS IN A TRAILER IN THE REAR THERE.

UM, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE SKETCH PLAN DEPICTS THERE'S AN EIGHT FOOT HIGH WOOD PRIVACY FENCE SURROUNDING UP TWO SIDES OF THE PROPERTY, AND THEN A SHARED EIGHT FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH SOME OVERGROWTH NEXT TO PENINSULA AUTOMOTIVE AS WELL AS A MESH GATE.

AND THESE ARE JUST SOME PHOTOS OF THE SITE.

SO THAT'S THE FRONT OF THE SITE THERE.

UM, LOOKING FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, YOU'LL NOTICE YOU CAN SEE, UM, IF YOU LOOK BIT SOUTH TO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING, YOU'LL SEE THAT EIGHT FOOT HIGH FENCE.

AND THEN THAT SIDE ACCESS DRIVE THAT GOES TO THE MOBILE HARM PARK IN THE REAR.

THAT'S JUST ANOTHER PHOTO.

THAT'S THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

YOU CAN SEE THAT MESH GATE.

UM, AND THEN I DID MARK IN RED THERE, THE SHARED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, PENINSULA AUTOMOTIVE, TO KIND OF SHOW WHERE THAT FENCE LINE IS.

THESE ARE TWO PHOTOS.

AGAIN, YOU SEE THAT CARGO CONTAINER WITH SOME BUILDING MATERIALS ALONGSIDE IT.

AND THEN ANOTHER PHOTO KIND OF LOOKING INTO THE MESH GATE AND THAT TRAILER THAT'S ON SITE.

AGAIN, THESE ARE MORE PHOTOS OF THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.

AGAIN, THAT'S THAT OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA.

AND WE SEE THAT EIGHT FOOT HIGH BOARD FENCE.

AND THEN ALSO THE EXISTING MATURE TREE LINE THAT BUFFERS THE PROPERTY FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK IN THE REAR.

SO EXAMINING OUR SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH HERE, WE HAVE PENINSULA AUTOMOTIVE TO THE WEST.

WE HAVE TAB MOBILE HOME PARK, THAT'S A NON-CON, LEGALLY NON-CONFORMING MOBILE HOME PARK IN R 20.

UM, TO THE SOUTH WE HAVE VARIOUS CONTRACTORS SHOPS.

AND THEN TO THE EAST WE HAVE THE INTERCHANGE WITH ROUTE 1 34.

AND JUST VACANT LAND OWNED, OWNED BY VDOT.

AGAIN, SOME MORE PHOTOS YOU CAN SEE THERE.

SO WE HAVE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY AND THEN LOOKING, THERE'S THAT ABUTTING ACCESS DRIVE INTO THE REAR, THE MOBILE HOME PARK JUST LOOKING SOUTH ON GEORGE WASHINGTON TOWARDS THOSE ADJACENT CONTRACTOR SHOPS ACROSS THE STREET TOWARDS THE INTERCHANGE AND THE VACANT LAND.

AND THEN LOOKING NORTH, WE HAVE PENINSULA AUTOMOTIVE AND THEN DARBY ROAD, RIGHT BEYOND THAT.

SO STAFF'S OR PROPOSE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN THE RESOLUTION.

UM, WE WOULD INVOKE THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS TO, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, HAVE OPAQUE FENCING, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PRESENT ON SITE.

[00:25:01]

WE WOULD ASK THAT NO BUILDING MATERIAL BE VISIBLE ABOVE THE FENCE.

WE ALSO HAVE CONDITIONS WHICH ARE PROPOSED AT THE REQUEST OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY THAT HAVE TO DO WITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND THE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

SO KIND OF WRAPPING UP SOME CONCLUSIONS, UM, OUTDOOR STORAGE IS, WE FEEL ADEQUATELY SCREENED FROM ADJACENT VIEWS, GIVEN THE EXISTING FENCE.

AND AGAIN, THAT LARGE WOODED BUFFER IN THE REAR THERE.

BACKING UP TO THE MOBILE HOME PARK.

UM, REALLY GIVEN THE SURROUNDING USES, WE FEEL THIS WOULD HAVE LIMITED IMPACT ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

UM, ALL THE SURROUNDING USES ARE EITHER SIMILAR SHOPS, CONTRACTOR SHOPS, ONE'S AN AUTO SHOP, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THE MOBILE HOME PARK IS PRETTY WELL SCREENED AND WE FEEL THAT IT'S RELATIVELY COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING MIX OF USES GIVEN, WELL, FRANKLY, GIVEN, YOU KNOW, HOW EVERYTHING'S DESIGNATED IN THE COMP PLAN AS WELL.

IT'S ALL GENERAL BUSINESS.

SO WITH THAT NOTE, STAFF IS GONNA RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION PC 23 DASH 20.

UM, IT'S ABOUT ALL I'VE GOT FOR YOU TONIGHT.

THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS, AND THEN I CAN ADDRESS ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE AT THIS TIME.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO.

YEP.

MS. , I'D JUST LIKE TO UNDERSTAND TWO THINGS.

UM, YES.

WHAT'S THE VIEW OF THE NEIGHBORS AND WHAT DOING THIS, ARE WE CREATING A BIGGER PROBLEM ALONG THAT STREET IN TERMS OF EVERYBODY ELSE THEN WANTING TO DO THE SAME? DOES IT BECOME MUCH MORE UNSIGHTLY? I GUESS I'M CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT GOTCHA.

WHAT THIS, UH, LEADS TO IN TERMS OF, UH, AN IMPLICATION.

OKAY.

WELL, TO BE FRANK, SO, UM, I DID WALK BACK TO THE MOBILE HOME PARK AND KIND OF, AGAIN, IT'S, IT'S REALLY, YOU CAN'T SEE THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY FROM BACK THERE.

UM, FROM THE ACCESS DRIVE AGAIN, THE FENCE IS PRETTY HIGH.

AND SO UNLESS HE'S GOT BUILDING MATERIALS PEEKING ABOVE THAT CAN'T REALLY QUITE SEE WHAT'S THERE.

AND THEN FROM A REAR, AGAIN, YOU HAVE THAT PRETTY, AND THERE'S A LOT OF VINES IN THOSE TREES TOO.

SO YOU, THERE'S THE KIND OF PROVIDES THAT BUFFER BETWEEN THOSE USES.

UM, FRANKLY, AS FAR AS THE SURROUNDING USES ARE CONCERNED, I MEAN, WHEN YOU GO TO PENINSULA AUTOMATIC, THEY HAVE CARS ALL OVER THE PROPERTY.

A LOT OF THESE PROPERTIES ARE, YOU KNOW, GRANDFATHERED IN.

THEY'VE BEEN THERE FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

SO LOOK, YOU KNOW, AND WITH THE ADJACENT CONTRACTOR SHOPS, THERE'S ALREADY KIND OF SOME ONGOING ZONING ISSUES WITH WHAT THEY HAVE INSTALLED.

AND STAFF ZONING STAFF RATHER, HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THOSE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO GET THEM TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE.

SO REALLY WHAT THIS APPLICATION IS, IS HELPING THIS APPLICANT COME AND DO COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE VIA GETTING THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

YEAH.

DONE.

OKAY.

UH, AT THIS TIME, UH, WE'LL OPEN FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING NAME WITH THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS.

OKAY.

YEAH, GO AHEAD.

SORRY, I'M OUT OF BREATH.

THANK YOU, .

GOOD EVENING.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.

YEP, MY NAME'S UH, MICHAEL TYNDALL.

I LIVE AT 30 HOLLY STREET, POSA, VIRGINIA.

AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COUNCIL HAS REFERENCE TO MY APPLICATION.

OKAY.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANYONE? MR. WARD? ONE QUICK QUESTION.

MR. TYNDALL, HOW IS IT FENCING? WHAT'S GONNA BE STORED BACK THERE? I HAVE A CONTAINER, JUST HAS SOME TOOLS AND, UH, SOME SAWS AND SOME DECKING BOARDS THAT DIDN'T WANNA KEEP OUTSIDE.

I'VE, UH, SINCE MY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY, I, I'VE RENTED A INDOOR STORAGE SPACE IN OYSTER POINT PARK WHERE I KEEP, YOU KNOW, 95% OF MY MATERIAL NOW.

SO IT, IT'S NOT KEPT ON THAT SITE ANYMORE.

SO I'VE CLEANED THE, CLEAN THE SITE UP.

IT BECAME A BONE YARD AFTER 12 YEARS THERE.

I'M, I'M, I DO CUSTOM DECKS AND FENCES.

OCCASIONALLY WE GET SOME LEFTOVER MATERIAL.

IT KIND OF BUILT UP, IT KIND OF GOT OUTTA HAND, BUT WE'VE SINCE CLEANED IT UP AND IT'S LOOKING A WHOLE LOT BETTER DO.

VERY GOOD.

ONE QUESTION, DO YOU PLAN TO DO ANY MANUFACTURING IN THE STORAGE AREA? NO, SIR.

OKAY.

OKAY.

OKAY.

IF NOTHING ELSE, WE HAVE ONE, UM, PERSON SIGNED UP.

MIKE TYNDALL.

IS THAT YOU? THAT'S, YES, SIR.

DO YOU WANNA TALK SOME MORE ? UM, NO, IT'S MICHAEL TYNDALL ENTERPRISE IS BETTER, BETTER KNOWN AS MIKE TY'S CUSTOM DECKS IN FENCING.

IT'S JUST, THANK YOU.

[00:30:01]

OKAY.

THANK YOU SIR.

ALRIGHT.

I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER SIGNED UP.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE APPLICANT? OKAY.

HAVING HEARD NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'LL TURN IT OVER TO, UH, COMMISSIONERS FOR COMMENTS.

NOTHING.

OKAY.

I, I'VE SEEN THE PROPERTY.

IT APPEARS TO BE WELL SCREENED.

IT'S PROBABLY NOT MR. TY'S BEST DEMONSTRATION OF HIS, UH, FENCING, BUT, UH, IT IS ADEQUATE TO HIDE EVERYTHING BACK THERE.

OKAY.

I SUPPORT IT.

I'M GLAD TO HAVE A, A, A BUSINESS OWNER HERE IN THE COUNTY AND APPRECIATE YOU, UH, COMMITTING YOURSELF TO STAY HERE.

I THINK YOU'VE DONE EVERYTHING YOU CAN THAT'S NECESSARY TO SCREEN WHAT YOU'RE STORING IN THE BACK THERE, YOUR TOOLS OR WHATEVER.

I'LL BE SUPPORTING IT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

NO.

OKAY.

I CONCUR WITH MR. KING.

OKAY.

I DO TOO.

, DO WE HAVE A MOTION, MR. CHAIRMAN? I MOVE THAT WE SEND PC 23 DASH 20 TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR APPROVAL.

ROLL CALL PLEASE.

THE MOTION BY MR. TITUS IS TO ADOPT PC 23 DASH 20 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION TO AUTHORIZE A CONTRACTOR SHOP WITH OUTDOOR EXPOSED STORAGE AT 29 27 GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY.

MR. TITUS? YES.

MR. LEHAM? YES.

MR. KING? YES.

MR. KREER? YES.

MR. WASMER? YES.

MR. ROY? YES.

MR. SMITH? YES.

MOTION PASSES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UH, MOVING INTO, UH, OLD

[Charting the Course to 2040: The York County Comprehensive Plan: Commission discussion and consideration of a proposed resolution, pursuant to Section 15.2-2225 of the Code of Virginia, to approve, certify, and transmit to the Board of Supervisors a proposed updated Comprehensive Plan for York County. The draft Plan, titled Charting the Course to 2040: The York County Comprehensive Plan, is available for review on the York County website at www.york2040.com. ]

BUSINESS, UH, WE'RE GOING TO COVER THE, UM, CHARTING OF COURSE FOR 2040.

UH, BEFORE WE BEGIN, THE OBJECTIVE OF TONIGHT'S, UM, AGENDA FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS AND POINTS GATHERED FROM THE JUNE 14TH AND AUGUST 9TH PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FOLLOW ON INPUTS RECEIVED ON A DRAFT UPDATED PLAN PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC IN MAY.

AND IF UPON COMPLETION OF THAT REVIEW, THE COMMISSION DETERMINES THIS IS COMPLETE AND THOROUGH, A COMPLETE AND THOROUGH REVIEW AND DONE SO IN CONSIDERATION OF ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT PLAN AND SUBMIT IT TO THE YORK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION.

UH, COMMISSIONERS HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW, UH, RESOLUTION PC 2321 R.

UM, AS THIS IS OLD BUSINESS, THERE WILL NOT BE A PUBLIC HEARING OR AS CITIZENS MAY COMMENT, RATHER, THIS IS TO CONCLUDE THE BUSINESS, UM, OF A PREVIOUS MEETING THAT DID HOLD A PUBLIC MAR UH, HEARING.

I WILL NOTE THAT THE COMM COMMISSION HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PROVIDE A DELIVERABLE WE'VE BEEN TASKED IN, UH, ON A TIMETABLE THAT WE CHARTERED.

ADDING MORE TIME TO THIS PROCESS IS COUNTER TO THE REASON WE MADE THIS AN OPEN, TRANSPARENT, AND THOROUGH PROCESS THAT INCLUDED EQUAL ACCESS TO THIS YEAR LONG OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS AND CITIZEN GROUPS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, INCLUDING NOT ONE BUT TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS AFTER THE DRAFT WAS RELEASED IN MAY.

TO THAT POINT, I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE AN EMAIL RECEIVED YESTERDAY, SEPTEMBER THE 12TH, ADDRESSED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS FROM MR. RON STROBEL SIGNED AS A PRESIDENT OF THE CONSERVE YORK COUNTY FOUNDATION.

IN HIS LETTER, HE DESCRIBES HE DOES NOT QUESTION ANYTHING THAT IS SPECIFICALLY IN THE PLAN THAT WE ARE REVIEWING TONIGHT.

RATHER, IT OBJECTS TO STATEMENTS MADE IN THE SUMMARY OF A AUGUST 9TH PUBLIC HEARING AND WITH STAFF'S ASSISTANCE.

WE WILL RESPOND TO THIS LETTER, BUT IT HAS NO BEARING ON TONIGHT'S RESOLUTION.

IN KEEPING WITH THE TIMELINE I DISCUSSED EARLIER WITH THE AGREEMENT OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS.

UH, WE WILL CONTINUE ON OUR ESTABLISHED TRACK AND FINALIZE THE COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WITH REGARD TO THE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT TONIGHT'S MEETING.

UH, BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER'S DISCUSSION, WOULD THE STAFF LIKE TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS, UH, REGARDING PC 2321 R? UM, JUST WANT TO BRIEFLY GO OVER THE, UH, WHAT'S IN THAT ARE IN THE RESOLUTION.

UH, AS YOU MENTIONED, WE'VE HAD TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS.

UH, WE'VE HAD ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TONIGHT FROM SEVEN CITIZENS, UH, FOUR OF WHOM HAVE SPOKEN, UH, BEFORE.

SO WE'VE HAD, UH, I BELIEVE 22 INDIVIDUALS, UH, ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THE DRAFT PLAN.

AND THE, UH, RESOLUTION THAT WE PROVIDED YOU WITH RECOMMENDS CERTAIN REVISIONS.

UH, IN RESPONSE TO THOSE COMMENTS, UH, I JUST WANT TO TOUCH ON 'EM BRIEFLY.

UH, THE MAIN TOPIC OF DISCUSSION, UH, AS FAR AS CITIZEN COMMENTS HAS BEEN THE PRINCESS CRUISE LINES PROPOSAL, UH, WHICH HAS NOW BEEN, UH, MENTIONED BY BELIEVE, UH, 11 CITIZENS WHO SPOKEN IN OPPOSITION.

[00:35:02]

UM, AND WE HEARD, UH, SEVERAL PEOPLE TONIGHT RECOMMEND THAT WE JUST TAKE THE LANGUAGE OUT OF THE PLAN.

UH, THERE IS A, THERE'S A BRIEF PARAGRAPH IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT THAT JUST REFERENCES, UH, THE FACT THAT THE PROPOSAL HAS BEEN MADE.

UM, I DON'T THINK IT HARMS THE PLAN ANY TO JUST TAKE THAT PARAGRAPH OUT.

UH, HOWEVER, IF YOU DECIDE THAT YOU WANT TO LEAVE IT IN, UH, WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME, UH, ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE, UH, FIRST OF ALL, UH, BECAUSE, UH, SOME OF THE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSAL HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE LANGUAGE WAS FIRST PUT IN.

UH, SO IT'S, UH, OUT OF DATE, UH, IN CERTAIN, AS CERTAIN RESPECTS.

AND, BUT ALSO WE ADDED SOME REFERENCES, UH, AS, AS ONE OF THE SPEAKERS MENTIONED ABOUT, UH, PRESERVING, UH, PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF YORKTOWN.

SO IT'S UP TO YOU ALL.

UH, YOU CAN JUST TAKE OUT THE PARAGRAPH ALTOGETHER, UH, UH, OR YOU CAN PROVIDE, UH, ALTERNATIVE, UH, LANGUAGE.

IS THIS IN REFERENCE TO THE PARAGRAPH ON, I GUESS IT'S PAGE SEVEN, PARDON ME, OF THE SUMMARY? PAGE TWO.

I THINK IT'S THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SECTION ATTEMPT, RIGHT, MR. CHAIR? IT'S PAGE SEVEN OF THE SUMMARY.

YEAH, SEVEN SEVEN OF THE SUMMARY.

I'M SORRY.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

IT'S ALSO IN THE PC 2321 R ON OF THE RESOLUTION.

CORRECT.

IT'S, UH, IT'S ACTUALLY PAGE SIX OF THE, UH, OF THE SUMMARY.

AND IF YOU LOOK AT YOUR RESOLUTION, THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST ONE ACTUALLY, UH, ON PAGE TWO, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT.

SO, UH, SO BASICALLY, AS I SAID, YOU COULD EITHER JUST TAKE OUT THE PARAGRAPH ALTOGETHER, YOU CAN REVISE IT.

UH, IT'S, IT'S YOUR PLEASURE, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO.

UH, AGAIN, I DON'T THINK IT HARMS ANYTHING JUST TO REMOVE THE REFERENCE ALTOGETHER.

WE DID AT THE WORK SESSION THERE, THERE WAS SORT OF A FEELING THAT THAT MIGHT BE THE WAY TO GO.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I, IF I MAY, I, I, I KIND OF CONCUR WHAT, UH, MR. CROSS IS SAYING BY REMOVING IT.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE HEARD TONIGHT, THAT, UH, WE'D LIKE THAT, UH, MOVED OR TAKEN OUT OF THE PLAN.

I WILL NOTE, HOWEVER, THERE IS THE LAST HALF OF THAT STATEMENT IS, UH, PUT THERE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE GOAL OF IT IS TO PRESERVE THE CHARACTER OF, OF THE, OF YORKTOWN.

AND THAT IT CAN BE ACCOMMODATED WITHOUT ADVERSE IMPACTS THAT REALLY SERVES A, UH, AN IMPORTANT ROLE BY LEAVING SOME OF THAT IN THERE.

UM, 'CAUSE IT, IT'S EXPLICIT IN THE SENSE THAT IT'S DESCRIBING EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANT, BUT I'D BE IN FAVOR OF TAKING IT ALL OUT TOGETHER.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE HEARD TONIGHT.

IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S WHAT THE CITIZENS OF YORKTOWN WANT.

UH, I DON'T KNOW WHAT PURPOSE IT SERVES BEING IN THERE OTHER THAN, UH, STATING THAT THE GOAL IS TO PRESERVE THE CHARACTER AND IF THE CRUISE SHIP, IF WERE TO EVER COME, AND IT'S, IT'S DEMONSTRATED THAT IT HAS AN IMPACT ON THE BEAUTY AND CHARACTER OF LIFE, UM, THAT IT SHOULD NOT MOVE FORWARD.

SO THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

THAT I, I AGREE WITH MR. KING AND A LOT OF THINGS THERE, ESPECIALLY THE SECOND HALF OF THAT PARAGRAPH.

I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TO BE IN THERE.

BUT IT'S A MATTER OF ALSO, IF WE TAKE IT OUT, THERE'S NO TRANSPARENCY AT ALL BECAUSE IF THE PRINCESS CRUISE LINE IS GONNA GO FORWARD WITH OR WITHOUT THIS BEING IN THIS, THIS PLAN, I MEAN, I, IT, THE PLAN IS NOT RELEVANT TO WHETHER IT'S IN OR OUT, AND WHETHER PRESIDENT'S CRUISE LINES COMES HERE OR NOT.

IT'S NOT EVEN, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT, MY THOUGHT WAS IF WE LEAVE IT IN, AT LEAST IT LETS THE CITIZENS KNOW IT'S VERY TRANSPARENT WHAT IS GOING FORWARD.

'CAUSE WE HAVE HEARD IN THE PAST, THE CITIZENS WERE BLINDSIDED BY PRINCESS PAN, PRINCESS CRUISE LINE COMING HERE.

SO THEY WERE UPSET ABOUT THAT AND BE SO IT WAS TRANSPARENCY.

I THINK WE'D LEAVE IT IN IT'S MORE TRANSPARENT THAT WAY THAN TAKE IT OUT.

BUT, UH, IT HAS NO BEARING.

IF I'M, IF I MAY, I, I WOULD JUST, UM, ADD THAT, UH, I BELIEVE IT WAS MR. BOWDITCH WHO SPOKE ABOUT THIS, UH, AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING.

AND HIS POINT WAS THAT BY HAVING IT IN THE PLAN, EVEN REFERENCING IT, IT IT MIGHT BE CONSTRUED AS GIVING THE IMPRESSION THAT SOMEHOW THE PLAN, UH, YOU KNOW, IS ENDORSING THE PROPOSAL.

UH, AND THAT WAS THE, THE CONCERN THAT HE, UH, ARTICULATED WHEN HE SPOKE AT THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARING.

I'D BE INCLINED TO PUT IN A, A PARAGRAPH THAT STATED THAT THERE'S GREATER THAN 5,000 CITIZENS WHO HAVE SHOWN, UM, A DESIRE NOT TO HAVE THE CRUISE SHIPS, UH, IN YORKTOWN FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS.

BE IT, BE IT NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITY, ET CETERA.

I THINK IF WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE ANYTHING IN, IT'S GOTTA BE BALANCED WITH A MESSAGE THAT IT IS

[00:40:01]

HIGHLY DISLIKED BY THE, BY SOME BY 5,000.

THAT'S MORE THAN SOME, IT'S NOT 70.

I'D BE MR. CHAIRMAN, I'D BE HESITANT TO QUOTE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND, YOU KNOW, YEAH, I WOULDN'T EITHER.

UM, I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE RIGHT, UH, GOAL HERE.

I THINK WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE IS TO MAKE A STATEMENT THAT WHATEVER HAPPENS IN NEW YORKTOWN, WE SHOULDN'T DETRACT FROM HIS HISTORICAL CHARACTER QUALITY OF LIFE AND LEAVE IT AT THAT.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY NECESSARY, UH, REASON WHY WE HAVE TO STATE PRINCESS CRUZ'S LINE IN THERE.

YOU GUYS KNOW ABOUT IT.

WE'VE HEARD ABOUT IT, AND I'VE HEARD WHAT YOU SAID, UH, THAT, UH, IT WASN'T AS TRANSPARENT.

WE DON'T MAKE THOSE CALLS.

IT'S NOT US.

IT'S HAPPENING.

UH, OR IT MAY OR MAY NOT, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH US.

OUR GOAL IS PRIMARILY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO IF THERE'S DESIRE OF THE COMMISSION TO PUT A STATEMENT IN THERE SAYING THE LAST PARAGRAPH'S PRETTY GOOD, WE COULD JUST REWORD IT A LITTLE BIT.

YEP.

UH, THAT SAYS IT ALL AND REMOVE EVERYTHING BEFORE THAT.

UH, AND SO THE CRUISE LINE IS NOT NECESSARILY IN THERE, AND WE'RE JUST MAKING A STATEMENT THAT IF ANY SUCH ACTIVITY WERE TO OCCUR, THAT IT WOULD HAVE TO PRESERVE THE CHARACTER OF YORKTOWN.

I'M IN FAVOR OF DOING THAT.

I MEAN, THAT'S THE MIDDLE OF THE GROUND HERE.

UM, CAN WE RECOMMEND WHAT PORTION OF THAT PARAGRAPH SPECIFICALLY, AND WE CAN RECORD THAT TONIGHT AS PART OF OUR RESERVATION? IF Y'ALL AREN'T MAKING CHANGES TO THAT, I JUST WANNA COME ON RECORD THAT I, I'D BE IN FAVOR OF JUST REMOVING IT COMPLETELY.

OKAY.

IF THE IDEA IS NOT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, WHY IS IT, WHY IS IT THERE? I AGREE THAT, UH, AT THIS POINT, IF THE CAT'S OUT OF THE BAG, EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT.

THANK GOD.

IT'S, AND IT'S REALLY, IT'S FUNNY.

IT'S THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHERE I HEARD ABOUT IT, YOU KNOW, SO THIS PROCESS DID BRING IT TO THE FOREFRONT, BUT NOW PEOPLE KNOW.

AND, BUT I DON'T THINK, UNLESS I DON'T THINK IT NEEDS TO BE PART OF OUR PLAN AT THIS POINT.

I DON'T THINK IT'S FAR ENOUGH ALONG.

THAT'S WHERE I STAND.

WELL, KEEP IN MIND ON NUMBER FIVE, I'M SORRY, MR. CHAIRMAN, WE ALSO TALK ABOUT IT UNDER PUBLIC FACILITIES ABOUT, UM, YEAR-ROUND VISITATION YORK GENERAL MANNER THAT DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE VILLAGES HISTORIC CHARM AND CHARACTER AND THE RESIDENT'S QUALITY OF LIFE.

SO WE ALL, WE HAVE THAT IN THERE ALREADY.

AND THAT'S WHAT I WAS ABOUT TO SAY, UH, BECAUSE IF, IF, IF, IF YOU LEAVE IN THE SECOND PART OF THAT PARAGRAPH AND TAKE OUT THE FIRST PART, THERE'S REALLY NO CONTEXT.

BUT I THINK YOU ACHIEVED, ACHIEVED THE SAME THING BY MAKING THAT CHANGE UNDER NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS ADDING THE LANGUAGE ABOUT, IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE VILLAGE'S HISTORIC CHARM AND CHARACTER AND THE RESIDENCE QUALITY OF LIFE.

UH, AND IF YOU WANTED TO, WE COULD ADD, UH, UH, MISS, UH, TAYLOR, I BELIEVE IT WAS, UH, THE LANGUAGE THAT SHE, UH, HAVE RECOMMENDED ABOUT, UH, ADVERSELY AFFECTING WATER QUALITY IN THE ECOSYSTEM.

I, I'D BE IN FAVOR OF THAT AND WE'D ELIMINATE THE WHOLE SECTION UNDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

I'M SATISFIED.

I WOULD BE GOOD.

AGREE.

I THINK WE'VE COME TO AN AGREEMENT OF, OKAY, SO WE'RE TAKING OUT THE WHOLE PARAGRAPH ONE, THAT PARAGRAPH, UH, UNDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

YEP.

OKAY.

UH, MOVING.

OKAY.

SO, SO DOES THAT REQUIRE MOTION BEFORE? NO, NO, NO.

WE'LL, WE'LL, I THINK WE JUST VOTE ON VOTE.

DO 'EM ALL TOGETHER.

YOU TAKE A VOTE AT THE END AFTER YOU REACH CONSENSUS ON EACH OF THESE ITEMS. OKAY.

WELL, IT'S ALREADY AN R SO THIS WILL MAKE IT PC 23 DASH 21 R ONE.

UH, AND THE REASON THAT THE, WE GAVE THE RESOLUTION AS AN R IS THAT WE MADE, UH, JUST A COUPLE OF CHANGES AFTER THE RESOLUTION WENT OUT.

UM, MR. HORO HAD REQUESTED THAT WE UPDATE THE CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA, UM, THAT APPEARS IN THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT UNDER, UH, LAW ENFORCEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY.

UH, AT THE TIME THE DRAFT WAS WRITTEN, UH, THAT WAS THE MOST RECENT DATE AVAILABLE FROM THE VIRGINIA STATE POLICE.

UM, BUT WE HAVE NOW UPDATED IT.

SO YOU HAVE THAT IN YOUR REVISED RESOLUTION, UH, PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, PAGE 1 49, 1 50.

YOU CAN SEE THERE THE CHANGES TO THE TEXT.

AND THEN, UH, YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE REVISIONS TO TABLE ONE, WHICH SHOWS THE RATIO OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO POPULATION, UH, AS WELL AS PUBLIC, UH, FACILITIES.

FIGURE ONE SHOWS THE PERCENT CHANGE, IN INSTANCE, OF CRIME PER A THOUSAND, UH, POPULATION.

UH, SO, UH, WE MADE THAT CHANGE AT MR. ROY'S REQUEST QUEST.

I THOUGHT THAT CAPTURED IT VERY WELL.

THANK YOU.

WELL, THANK MR. ANDERSON.

HE, UH, THAT'S HIS ELEMENT, AND HE, HE DID THAT WORK.

AND WELL, IT WAS A LOT HARDER THAN YOU MIGHT'VE YOU MIGHT IMAGINE.

BUT

[00:45:01]

WE'RE HAPPY TO, HAPPY TO DO IT.

WE, UH, WE TRIED TO FIND, TO USE THE MOST UPTODATE, UH, DATA SOURCES THAT WE CAN.

UH, WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT NUMBER FIVE.

IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU ALL WANTED TO, UH, LEAVE THAT IN THERE AS REVISED, OR, WELL, I GUESS, UH, DID WE, DID WE REACH AGREEMENT ON ADDING THE, UH, UH, ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE THAT WAS PROPOSED TONIGHT? I'M IN FAVOR.

YES.

I THINK SO.

THERE A CONSENSUS ON THAT.

WE'LL JUST NEED THOSE WORDS.

YES, I'VE ASKED HER TO PROVIDE THAT TO US.

WE'LL, WE'LL GET IT IN THE RESOLUTION.

OKAY.

UM, NEXT, NUMBER SIX.

UH, THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT, UH, ACTUALLY WE INITIATED.

I MENTIONED IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT THE CODE OF VIRGINIA REQUIRES US TO, UM, SEND THE, UH, DRAFT PLAN TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UH, SO THEY CAN REVIEW IT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH, UH, STATE TRANSPORTATION PLANS.

UM, WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN A FORMAL RESPONSE, UH, BUT I DID, UH, GET A PHONE CALL FROM THE, UH, VDOT EMPLOYEE IN THE SUFFOLK DIS OR HAMPTON ROADS DISTRICT OFFICE.

UM, AND SHE WAS, SHE SAID EVERYTHING LOOKED FINE.

AND SHE, UH, SHE, SHE ALLUDED TO THE FACT THAT, UH, UH, YOU KNOW, THERE IS A PROJECT TO ADD A, A, UH, DEBY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGED I 64, AND THAT'S GONNA HAVE AN IMPACT ON DEBY BOULEVARD.

UH, WE TALK IN THE, WE EVEN IN THE DRAFT PLAN, WE TALK ABOUT THE NEED TO IMPROVE DENBY BOULEVARD, THE PROJECTED TRAFFIC GROWTH THERE.

UH, BUT SINCE SHE MADE THAT COMMENT, UH, WE WENT AHEAD AND JUST CHANGED THAT DESCRIPTION A LITTLE BIT TO REFERENCE THAT INTERCHANGE PROJECT, UH, SINCE IT'LL HAVE AN EFFECT ON DEN BOULEVARD.

SO THAT'S, UH, NUMBER SIX THERE UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

THE, UH, NUMBER SEVEN, WE, UH, UH, WE MADE A WORDING CHANGE, UH, ADDED CLARIFYING LANGUAGE IN THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT REGARDING THE NEED TO PURSUE FUNDING FOR BOTH, UH, CAPACITY ENHANCING AND SAFETY RELATED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.

UH, THAT WAS IN RESPONSE TO A, UH, COMMENT FROM, UH, UH, MR. CHAMBERLAIN, WHO'S IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT.

DIDN'T SPEAK TONIGHT, BUT, UH, HE SPOKE AT THE BOTH PREVIOUS PUBLIC, UH, HEARINGS.

AND, UH, WHAT WE DID NOT INCLUDE, UH, WAS, UH, THE SUGGESTION, UH, THAT HE MADE REGARDING DESIGNATING A PERCENTAGE OF FUTURE BUDGET SURPLUSES, THE EARMARK FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.

AND WE DIDN'T INCLUDE IT BECAUSE YOU ALL DISCUSSED THAT AT YOUR JUNE 22ND WORK SESSION, AND DECIDED THAT THAT'S REALLY A BUDGET DECISION TO BE MADE YEAR BY YEAR BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND NOT SOMETHING TO PUT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO THAT'S THE REASON WHY THAT WAS NOT, UH, ADDED TO THE RESOLUTION.

IF YOU HAD A CHANGE OF HEART, YOU CAN, UH, YOU CAN PUT IT, YOU CAN PUT IT IN THERE, BUT AS OF NOW, UH, IT'S NOT, UH, IN THERE.

SO THAT'S, UH, THE, THE WORDING CHANGE IS UNDER TRANSPORTATION STRATEGY 1.1.

UH, MOVING ON TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT, WE MADE A WORDING CHANGE TO THE DISCUSSION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

UH, THAT WAS AT THE REQUEST OF MR. HOWELL, WHO WAS ALSO IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT, BUT DID NOT SPEAK, BUT HE DID SPEAK AT THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARINGS, UH, WHERE WE CHANGED THE WORD FEELINGS TO POSITIONS IN REGARD TO PEOPLE EXPRESSING, UH, THEIR OPINIONS ABOUT SHORT-TERM RENTALS AND, UH, THE NEED TO, YOU KNOW, PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM TO DO THAT.

UH, AGAIN, WE DID NOT ADD GUIDELINES FOR STR, UH, BECAUSE YOU ALL DISCUSSED THIS AT THE WORK SESSION, AND THE GENERAL CONSENSUS WAS NOT TO DO.

SO, UH, I WOULD NOTE THAT THE BOARD PLANS TO TAKE UP THIS ISSUE EARLY NEXT YEAR.

AND UNTIL THEN, WE REALLY DON'T HAVE ANY DIRECTION FROM THE BOARD AS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO.

AND I'M NOT SURE THAT WE WANT TO PREDETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF THAT DISCUSSION.

UH, AND WE'D RECOMMEND THAT WE JUST LET THE PROCESS PLAY OUT IN THE FIRST FEW MONTHS OF 2024.

THESE ARE THE ONES, UH, AGAIN, THERE, THERE'S, I MEAN, I, I THINK THE ONE THING THAT, THAT EVERYBODY CAN AGREE ON IS THAT SHORT-TERM RENTALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS, UH, SHOULD NOT, ALMOST EVERYONE SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED AS A MATTER OF, RIGHT? THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR, FOR PUBLIC, UH, COMMENT.

AND, UH, THAT IS CAPTURED IN THE, UH, LANGUAGE THAT'S IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT.

AND IT FURTHER STATES THAT, UH, IN THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE THERE IS NO ON THERE, THE OWNER IS NOT RESIDING IN THE HOME, UH, WHEN RENTALS

[00:50:01]

ARE TAKING PLACE, THAT THOSE KINDS OF APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO ADDITIONAL SCRUTINY.

SO I THINK THE EXISTING LANGUAGE PRETTY WELL CAPTURES WHAT HAS BEEN THE COUNTY'S APPROACH TO DATE.

UH, IT, IT MAY CHANGE NEXT YEAR.

WE REALLY DON'T KNOW WE'RE WE, UH, YOU KNOW, WE'LL, WE WILL HAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS, UH, PROBABLY FEBRUARY, MARCH OF NEXT YEAR WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND FIND OUT EXACT, FIND OUT EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT TO DO.

THE, UH, THE ONLY CHANGE TO THE, UH, LAND USE MAP, UH, THE 2040 LAND USE MAP IS THE, UH, ONE THAT I MENTIONED, UH, IN MY PRESENTATION ON AUGUST 9TH.

IT'S A PROPERTY ON ROUTE 17, I BELIEVE.

THE ADDRESS IS 78 0 1.

IT'S, UH, OWNED BY NEW NEWPORT NEWS WATERWORKS.

IT'S PART OF THE WA HARWOODS HARWOODS MILL RESERVOIR WATERSHED.

AND RIGHT NOW WE HAVE IT DESIGNATED AS GENERAL BUSINESS.

OBVIOUSLY THAT MAKES NO SENSE.

UH, SO WE RECOMMENDING THAT THAT BE CHANGED TO CONSERVATION, UH, LIKE ALL THE WATERSHED PROPERTY, UH, IS.

AND WE HAVE A LETTER, WHICH YOU ALL RECEIVED, UH, FROM NEW'S WATERWORKS SAYING THAT THEY SUPPORT THAT CHANGE.

UH, BUT, UH, THAT'S THE ONLY PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE LAND USE MAP.

YOU DID HEAR FROM, I BELIEVE IT WAS FOUR CITIZENS AT YOUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING, UH, ADVOCATING SOME, UH, CHANGES TO THE LAND USE MAP, SPECIFICALLY OBJECTING TO THE REMOVAL OF THE MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION IN, UH, UH, IN TWO AREAS OF THE COUNTY.

AND YOU HEARD FROM, UH, TWO PROPERTY OWNER, TWO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS.

AND THEN THERE WERE TWO PEOPLE WHO SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF ONE OF THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS, UH, REQUEST.

BUT AGAIN, THIS WAS DISCUSSED BY YOU ALL AT THE WORK SESSION JUNE 22ND, AND YOU DECIDED TO LEAVE THE MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION TO REMOVE IT FROM THE PLAN AS THE DRAFT PLAN DOES.

SO WE DID NOT MAKE ANY CHANGE THERE.

AND SO THOSE ARE THE PROPOSED CHANGES THAT ARE, UH, SPELLED OUT IN PC 23 DASH 21 R, OR WILL BE R ONE R ONE.

ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONER ONE? ONE LAST COMMENT, MR. CHAIRMAN.

THERE WAS A, THERE WAS AN INSINUATION THIS EVENING THAT WE HAVE RUSHED THIS PROCESS.

UM, WE'VE HAD 33 MEETINGS, CORRECT? MR. CROSS, 34, I BELIEVE IT WAS 34 MEETINGS, UH, PRESERVE YORKTOWN WAS THERE EITHER MR. HORO OR MR. STRUBLE.

AT ALMOST EVERY SINGLE MEETING, I MADE A SPECIFIC ATTEMPT AS CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE TO GIVE EVERYBODY AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, INCLUDING MR. ROY AND MR. STRUBBLE.

OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS AT OUR FINAL WORK SESSION, I MADE A MOTION TO HAVE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING SO YOU COULD BE HEARD.

AND SEVERAL OF YOU CAME LAST MONTH AND SPOKE AGAIN.

UH, WE ALSO SUSPENDED THE RULES INSTEAD OF THREE MINUTES TO GIVE EACH CITIZEN FIVE MINUTES TO COMMUNICATE WHAT YOU WANTED TO COM UH, COMMUNICATE WITH THE COMMISSION.

I FELT WE'VE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND.

THERE'S BEEN PLENTY OF TIME OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS FOR CITIZENS TO COMMENT ALONG THE WAY.

THE DRAFT HAS BEEN ON THE, UH, ON THE WEBSITE FOR EVERYONE TO REVIEW CITIZENS ALIKE.

UM, WE'RE AT THE FINAL END OF OUR PROCESS HERE FOR THE COMMISSION MIND.

YOU'LL WANNA REMIND EVERYBODY IT'S NOT OVER.

YOU STILL HAVE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHO ARE REQUIRED TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS.

YOU'LL GET YOUR CHANCE TO BE HEARD THERE AS WELL.

BUT WE NEED TO WRAP THIS THING UP.

I THINK THE COMMISSIONERS, THE COMMITTEE, HAS DONE A GOOD JOB IN TRYING TO GET AS, AS MUCH INPUT AS THEY COULD INTO THE PLAN, UH, BECAUSE YOUR RESIDENTS HERE, AND THIS IS YOUR FUTURE.

AND I THINK WE'VE DONE THAT.

WE'VE SHOWN THAT WE'VE DONE IT AGAIN THIS EVENING.

UM, WE TRIED TO RESPOND TO EACH OF YOUR REQUESTS.

OF COURSE, NOT EVERYBODY CAN BE HAPPY.

CAN'T GET EVERYTHING YOU WANT HERE.

IT'S A BALANCE BETWEEN, UM, RESIDENTS WISHES AND DESIRES, DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, A BALANCE OF THE ENVIRONMENT, UH, A NUMBER OF THINGS.

I'M PRETTY SATISFIED AS CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE.

I THINK WE'VE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND HAVE DONE THAT, AND I'M READY TO MOVE IT FORWARD.

MR. CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ANY MORE COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS? I HAVE, UH, A COMMENT.

MY COMMENT IS REALLY AROUND DEVELOPMENT.

AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF

[00:55:01]

NOTES BACK AND FORTH THIS WEEK ON, ON HOUSING AND THE, AND THE, UH, AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT, PARTICULARLY IN THE UPPER DISTRICT.

AND IT ALL KEEPS COMING BACK TO THE NUMBER OF HOMES BUILT IN THE LAST 10 YEARS.

AND FOR ME, THE NUMBER OF HOMES BUILT IN THE LAST 10 YEARS IS A LAGGING INDICATOR.

AND IT'S USELESS.

IT ONLY COMPARES, OR IT ONLY TELLS YOU HOW GOOD YOUR LAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS IN TERMS OF BEING MET.

BUT IT DOESN'T DO ANYTHING FOR SETTING THE FUTURE.

I WANT LEADING INDICATORS.

AND WE'VE SEEN THAT DISCUSSION.

WE'VE SEEN ELEMENTS OF, LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF REZONINGS THAT OCCURRED, OR LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF HOUSES THAT ARE IN THE PIPELINE, AND HOW DO WE PUT A HANDLE AROUND THAT? HOW DO WE SET A VISION FOR WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE OR WHAT ISN'T? AND THAT'S NOT IN HERE YET.

AND THAT'S THE ONE ELEMENT THAT I THINK STILL NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN THAT I DON'T SEE.

AND I'VE ASKED FOR IT, AND I'VE, I'VE GONE TO THE POINT OF SAYING, WE NEED TO TABLE THIS TILL THE NEXT MEETING, UH, SO THAT WE GET THAT SECTION WRITTEN PROPERLY.

'CAUSE IT'S NOT THERE YET.

WHAT SECTION SPECIFICALLY ARE YOU REFERRING TO? IT'S, IT'S, IT'S ON THE POINT.

IT'S ON HOW WE DEVELOP.

IT'S ON HOW DO WE DEVELOP AND WHAT ARE THE NUMBER OF HOUSES AND HOW MANY ARE IN THE PIPELINE, AND HOW MANY OF THOSE ARE THE RESULT OF REZONING, AND WHAT LIMITS SHOULD WE HAVE, IF WE SHOULD HAVE LIMITS ON REZONING, AND WHERE DOES, AND WHERE DO WE SET OUR STRATEGY OR OUR VISION FOR WHERE WE WANNA BE 10 YEARS FROM NOW? AND I CAN'T FIND IT.

AND THAT'S MISSING.

AND I'VE SAID IT, AND I'VE, AND WE'VE HAD NOTES GOING BACK AND FORTH, AND THEY'RE NOT GETTING LISTENED TO.

MR. STRUBLE SAT AT THE LAST MEETING AND SPOKE SPECIFICALLY ON THIS TOPIC.

IT'S NOT HERE.

WE DIDN'T CAPTURE IT.

WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT.

WELL, WE, IT'S NOT HERE.

SO I'M, I'M AT THE POINT WHERE I'M SAYING, GET IT RIGHT.

GET THAT PARAGRAPH RIGHT BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD.

AND WHICH PARAGRAPH IS IT? WELL, I, I DON'T REALLY CARE WHERE IT GOES IN.

IT CAN GO ON IN UNDER DEVELOPMENT.

IT CAN GO IN UNDER, UNDER HOUSING, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE IN THERE.

SO MR. KING WOULD, HOW CAN YOU, YOU NEED TO SPECIFICALLY SAY WHERE YOU, YOU'RE UPSET ABOUT, I I'M ASKING STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED, BUT WHICH PARAGRAPH IS IT THAT YOU'RE OBJECTING TO? I'LL COME BACK TO YOU AFTER I'VE FOUND IT IN HERE.

I DID NOT LOOK THAT AT THE PARAGRAPH.

OKAY.

SO MY QUESTION, IF I MAY, TO MR. KING, WAS THIS AREA ADDRESSED OVER THE COURSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN? YOU KNOW, I'M OF THE THINKING THAT IF THERE'S A MISTAKE THAT WAS IN THE LAND OR IN THE, IN THE PLAN, THAT IT NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.

I'M NOT IN A POSITION TO OVERRULE THE WILL OF THE COMMITTEE, UH, THE REST OF THE COMMISSIONERS, UM, UNLESS THERE'S AN ERROR.

SO THAT'S MY POSITION.

OKAY.

UH, IF, UH, I MAY INTERJECT.

UH, THERE IS A, UH, TABLE IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT THAT TALKS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF FUTURE HOUSING UNITS IN THE DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE, UH, BROKEN DOWN BY UPPER COUNTY, LOWER COUNTY, AND TYPE OF UNIT.

UH, THE, UH, IT DOES NOT SAY HOW MANY OF THOSE WERE RESULTS OF REZONINGS.

I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT'S RELEVANT.

UM, THE, UH, THE, THE, THE, THE REAL BENCHMARK, UH, IS THE BUILD OUT, UH, WHICH IS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH IN, UH, IN, UH, THE HOUSING ELEMENT AND THE LAND USE ELEMENT.

UH, WE HAVE RETAINED THE, UH, LONGSTANDING, UH, POLICY GOING BACK TO THE ORIGINAL 1991 COMP PLAN OF, UH, SETTING DENSITIES, UH, WITH THE GOAL OF HAVING A, A, A MAXIMUM, WHAT WE CALL A MAXIMUM BUILD OUT POPULATION OF AROUND 80,000 RESIDENTS.

IN OTHER WORDS, IF ALL THE REMAINING RESIDENTIALLY DESIGNATED THE LAND WERE BUILT TO ITS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY USING AN ASSUMED NUMBER OF PERSONS PER HOUSEHOLD, UH, YOU KNOW, THE, THE, UH, POPULATION WOULD NOT EXCEED ABOUT, UH, 80,000.

UH, WE HAVE KEPT THAT IN THE PLAN.

UH, LIKE I SAY, IT'S BEEN IN, IN THE PLAN SINCE 1991.

AND THAT'S REALLY, UH, BEEN THE BENCHMARK, UH, THE LAND USE DENSITIES, UH, THAT ARE IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT.

UH, KEEP US ON TRACK TOWARD THAT GOAL.

UH, I WILL NOTE THAT, UH, WE DID, UH, WE DID, AS, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE DID RECOMMEND REMOVING THE MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION, UH, IN RESPONSE TO SOME OF THESE CONCERNS ABOUT OVERDEVELOPMENT BECAUSE QUITE FRANKLY, UH, THERE HAVE BEEN INSTANCES

[01:00:01]

WHERE, UH, DEVELOPERS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY ARGUE THAT THEIR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN BECAUSE THEY'RE IN ONE OF THESE AREAS WITH A MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION.

SO THEN WE WIND UP WITH, UH, PROJECTS, UH, STANDAL OR STANDALONE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS SUCH AS, UH, WHITAKER'S MILL OR MARQUE HILLS, THE WHOLE, THE MARQUE SOUTH POD.

AND, UH, THAT WAS A CONCERN FOR MANY OF THE CITIZENS WHO CAME TO OUR PUBLIC FORUMS. UH, DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL WAS A CONCERN THAT WAS EXPRESSED IN THE SCIENTIFIC SURVEY, UH, THAT WE CONDUCTED.

AND THE COMMITTEE AND THE STAFF WERE SENSITIVE, ARE SENSITIVE TO THOSE CONCERNS.

AND SO THAT'S ONE REASON WHY WE RECOMMEND TAKING OUT THE MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE THAT MR. STR BEL, UH, BROUGHT UP.

I THINK IT WAS AT THE JUNE HEARING.

NO, IT WAS THE LAST HEARING, I THINK, UM, REGARDING, UH, ECONOMIC OR COMMERCIALLY DESIGNATED LAND BEING DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL, I E THE REZONING ISSUE, UH, THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

UH, I WILL ALSO NOTE THAT THE PLAN DOES NOT INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ON ANY SINGLE PARCEL IN THE COUNTY.

SO, UH, YOU KNOW, WHAT WE'VE HEARD, UH, IN, IN THE FORUMS, UH, UH, REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IS, UH, UH, YOU KNOW, UH, WE'RE NOT, WE'RE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT.

WE'RE JUST, WE'RE IN FAVOR OF DEVELOPMENT.

IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN.

AND, AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE GOT BEFORE YOU .

IT'S, UH, THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ARE, UH, THE SAME AS THEY ARE IN THE CURRENT COMP PLAN, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE REMOVAL OF THE MIXED USE OVERLAY DESIGNATION, WHICH, UH, YOU KNOW, LESSENS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR RESIDENTIAL REZONING.

SO, MR. MORGAN'S OWN MEMO INDICATED THERE'S 4,000, 4,200 HOMES BEING ADDED AS A RESULT OF REZONING OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS.

AND I, I JUST DON'T SEE THAT DATA IN HERE.

I DON'T SEE ANY REFLECTION OF THAT.

I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE STRONGER LANGUAGE IN TERMS OF WHAT OUR EXPECTATIONS ARE.

WHAT SHOULD WE HAVE IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF REZONINGS? 80,000 IS ASSUMING THAT YOU BUILD OUT ALL THE EXISTING PROPERTIES AT THEIR CURRENT ZONING.

BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THE, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE PRACTICE HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS NOW.

IT'S BEEN TO REZONE AND, AND CRAMP IN HIGH DENSITY.

AND THAT'S THE POINT THAT I THINK NEEDS TO GET IN HERE.

AND IT'S MISSING WHAT? THAT WE SHOULD NEVER REZONE PROPERTY.

NO.

THAT WE SHOULD HAVE LIMITS THAT WE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE PROBABLY OVERBUILT IN THE PAST 10 YEARS THAT THAT POINT NEEDS TO BE IN FRONT OF US AS WE GO FORWARD WITH THIS PLAN.

I'LL LET SOMEBODY ELSE SPEAK.

THANK YOU.

OVERBUILT BY NOT OVERBUILT THE TOTAL COUNTY, JUST OVERBUILT IN CERTAIN AREAS.

YEAH, IT'S, IT'S CLEARLY CERTAIN AREAS.

SO THE 80,000 FOR THE WHOLE COUNTY, IT'S STILL GOOD.

I THINK IT IS.

AND THAT'S, IT'S NOT A LEADING INDICATOR, BUT, AND I WAS GONNA ASK YOU EARLIER, WHAT LEADING INDICATORS WOULD YOU PROPOSE OF HOUSING? THE NUMBER IN, THE NUMBER IN THE QUEUE, THE NUMBER THAT, UH, NOT YET BILL, UH, THE NUMBER THAT ARE THE RESULT OF ZO.

AND THEN WHAT SHOULD OUR LIMITS BE GIVEN THAT HISTORY.

SO IF WE NEVER REZONE, WE WON'T HAVE A PROBLEM.

WELL, THAT'S TRUE, BUT WE WILL WELL, MR. HOL, MR. HOLROYD, JANUARY 1ST, YOU'LL BE ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND YOU CAN VOTE AGAINST HIM.

WELL, THANK YOU.

UM, MR. CHAIRMAN, I, I THINK WE, I THINK WE'VE BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO SATISFY AS MANY PEOPLE AS WE CAN.

AND I THINK WE'VE DONE ALL WE CAN.

UM, AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO, WE HAVE TO MOVE ON.

AND I'M IN FAVOR OF MOVING, UH, THE RESOLUTION PC 23.

I'M IN FAVOR OF TABLING A MOTION TO THE NEXT MEETING SO THAT WE CAN CORRECT THIS.

UH, I DON'T KNOW THE POINT OF ORDER WHERE IT'S GOT, I THINK THERE'S, THERE'S A MOTION MADE TO APPROVE IT.

WE VOTE ON THIS MOTION.

I MADE THE FIRST MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION.

SO WE VOTE ON THAT.

TABLE TAKES.

OKAY, SO WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT? YES.

OKAY.

POINT OF ORDER.

UM, ARE ALL MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE OR STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIR NEED TO, UH, STEP BACK AS HE IS BASICALLY SUBMITTING HIS OWN WORK TO WHAT, WHAT? THERE'S NO COPY IN SITUATION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I WANTED THAT CLARIFIED.

SO DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? I THINK THE MOTION WAS RAISED BY MR. KING.

YEP.

WELL, BUT NO, HE SAID THAT YOUR MOTION TO TABLE TAKES PRECEDENCE.

YOUR YOURS NEEDS TO GO FIRST.

MOTION TO

[01:05:01]

TABLE TAKES PRECEDENCE.

I SUBMIT A MOTION TO TABLE THIS, UH, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UM, RESOLUTION.

AND I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF ME.

IT'S, UH, PC 2321, PC 23 DASH 21 R ONE TO THE FOLLOWING MONTH, SO THAT WE CAN MAKE FINAL CHANGES ON THE, UH, HOUSING AND LAND USE SECTION.

OKAY.

ROLL CALL.

JUDGE.

IS IT R OR R? IT'S JUST THE MOTION TO TABLE RESOLUTION.

UH, PC 23 S.

21 R.

OKAY.

AS PRESENT, CLARIFY, THE MOTION BY MR. HO WRIGHT IS TO TABLE RESOLUTION 20.

PC 23 DASH 21 R.

MR. KING? NO.

MR. KREER? NO.

MR. WASSER? NO.

MR. ROY? YES.

MR. TITUS? NO.

MR. MS. MISLEAD? YES.

MR. SMITH? NO.

MOTION PASSES.

UH, FAIL.

SORRY.

OKAY.

SO AT THIS POINT, UH, WE ARE GONNA ENTERTAIN A MOTION, UH, TO PUSH FORWARD PC 2321 DASH R ONE, UH, WITH THE LANGUAGE ADJUSTMENTS AND THE STRIKING OF PARAGRAPH ONE.

I'M SORRY.

BEFORE, BEFORE WE DO THAT, , UH, MR. HILL HAS SUGGESTED THAT WE ASK MS. TAYLOR TO COME BACK TO THE MICROPHONE AND SO WE CAN HAVE THE YES, THAT WAS CORRECT, EXACT LANGUAGE, UH, THAT SHE HAD, UH, PROPOSED.

I DON'T THINK VERY WELL ON MY FEET.

AND I DIDN'T WRITE IT DOWN, BUT ESSENTIALLY I WAS SAYING THAT I WOULD REQUEST FOLLOWING THAT, THAT STATEMENT THAT, UH, THE WORDS OR THE RESIDENT'S QUALITY OF LIFE OR ADVERSELY IMPACT THE ENVIRONMENT, I E THE ECOSYSTEM OF THE RIVER OR AIR QUALITY.

AS LONG AS YOU GET THOSE ELEMENTS IN THAT, THAT'S MY MAJOR CONCERN, IS THE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.

IT'S WONDERFUL TO HAVE THE BEAUTY PRESERVED AND THE HISTORIC QUALITY, BUT I'M CONCERNED THAT OR ADVERSELY IMPACT THE ENVIRONMENTS.

AND THEN SPECIFICALLY THE ECOSYSTEM OF THE RIVER AND THE AIR, AIR QUALITY FROM AIR QUALITY.

AIR QUALITY.

OKAY.

FUMES AND PARTICULATES.

KIND OF TAKING FROM THE TOP OF PAGE EIGHT AND THE SUMMARY, PERHAPS MR. ROSSER, I'M SORRY, WHAT IT MIGHT BE, SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE IS AT THE TOP OF PAGE EIGHT OF THE SUMMARY.

UH, WELL, THIS IS NEW LANGUAGE THAT, THAT SHE HAS GIVEN US.

SO IT'S, THIS WOULD BE, UH, UH, ON PAGE FOUR, THE RESOLUTION, UH, ITEM FIVE, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TOURISM STRATEGY, 1.2, UH, AND JUST ADDING THAT LANGUAGE AT THE END OF THAT SENTENCE AFTER QUALITY OF LIFE.

OKAY.

EVERYBODY IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT? YEAH.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

OKAY.

CAN WE ENTERTAIN A MOTION WITH THAT CHANGE? UH, MR. CHAIRMAN, I'LL TRY.

.

UH, I'D LIKE TO MOVE PC 23 DASH 21 R ONE, UH, WITH THE CHANGES OF REMOVING THE PARAGRAPH UNDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT, REFERRING TO PRINCESS, UH, CRUISE LINES AND ADDING THE, THE INPUT FROM MS. TAYLOR, UH, THAT SHE JUST PROVIDED US TO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES TOURISM STRATEGY ON PAGE ONE, I MEAN PAGE 1 92.

SHOULD WE PROVIDE THAT LANGUAGE AS PART OF THE MOTION OR NO? NO, WE'VE GOT, WE'VE GOT IT.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

AND I SAY WE LAUNCH.

THAT'S IT.

OKAY.

ROLL CALL PLEASE.

THE MOTION BY MR. KING IS TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER PC 23 DASH 21 R ONE TO APPROVE, CERTIFY, AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF THE DRAFT UPDATED YORK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

CHARTING THE COURSE TO 2040 AS REVISED.

MS. LIAM? YES.

MR. KING? YES.

MR. KRINER? YES.

MR. WATSER? YES.

MR. ROY? YES.

MR. TITUS? YES.

MR. SMITH? YES.

MOTION PASSES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR, UH,

[01:10:01]

ANCE HERE.

UH, AND ESPECIALLY I TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY BEFORE WE MOVE OUT OF THIS, UH, TOPIC TO, UH, THANK MR. KING, UH, FOR YOUR MANY, MANY, MANY HOURS AND MONTHS OF, OF LEADING THAT GROUP, AND ESPECIALLY TO THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR THE DEDICATION THAT THEY PUT FORTH ON BEHALF OF ALL OF US IN OUR ABSOLUTELY, ABSOLUTELY.

PUTTING TOGETHER AND THE STAFF.

IT'S A VERY COMPLEX AND IT'S A VERY DIFFICULT TASK, AND IT'S, IT'S BEEN DONE VERY WELL.

SO THANK YOU.

AND PLEASE PASS THAT THANKS ON TO, TO YOUR COMMITTEE MEMBERS.

WILL DO.

UM,

[8. New Business ]

AND IT BRINGS US, UH, TO NEW BUSINESS, I BELIEVE.

ANY NEW BUSINESS FROM ANYONE.

OKAY.

[9. Staff Reports/Recent Actions by the Board of Supervisors]

UH, STAFF REPORTS.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

AT THE AUGUST 15TH MEETING, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVED THE TWO JAVA DOG APPLICATIONS FOR THE COFFEE SHOP, UH, AND, UH, STORAGE SHED.

STORAGE SHED SALES, UH, ON MOTOWN ROAD.

THEY ALSO APPROVED THE TOMMY'S EXPRESS CAR WASH ON ROUTE 17.

THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY LAND USE CASES, UH, COMING UP ON THEIR MEETING NEXT WEEK.

UH, IN FACT, THEY HAVE NO PUBLIC HEARINGS AT ALL.

AS FAR AS, UH, Y'ALL'S, UH, NEXT AGENDA, OCTOBER 11TH, IT'S PRETTY FULL.

AGAIN, THIS IS TENTATIVE.

SOME OF THESE MIGHT, MIGHT GET, MIGHT HAVE TO BE POSTPONED, BUT FOR NOW, UH, WE HAVE SEVERAL APPLICATIONS.

WE HAVE TWO RELATED Y V A YORKTOWN VILLAGE ACTIVITY APPLICATIONS FOR PROPERTY, UH, ON WATER STREET, UH, RIGHT HERE IN THE VILLAGE.

UH, ONE APPLICATION IS TO EXPAND THE OUTDOOR DINING AREA BETWEEN THE YORKTOWN PUB AND LARRY'S LEMONADE.

AND THEN THE OTHER APPLICATION IS TO ESTABLISH A NEW RESTAURANT ON THE CORNER OF WATER STREET AND REED STREET.

UH, THREE PROPERTY OWNERS ALL OWNED BY THE SAME THREE PROPERTIES, ALL OWNED BY THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER.

SO THESE TWO APPLICATIONS KIND OF GO HAND IN HAND WITH EACH OTHER, BUT THEY ARE TWO, UH, SEPARATE APPLICATIONS.

WE ALSO HAVE AN APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH FOR A USE PERMIT FOR A VEHICLE WINDOW TINT, INSTALLATION, AND SALES BUSINESS IN A STRIP CENTER.

UH, ON ROUTE 17 AND TAB, IF YOU REMEMBER THE SCHROEDER CENTER, MOST OF YOU SHOULD REMEMBER, WE HAD THE, UH, TAMBORA NIGHTCLUB APPLICATION ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.

IT'S IN THAT SAME, UH, SHOPPING CENTER.

AGAIN, THAT'S VEHICLE, WINDOW TINT, INSTALLATION, AND SALES.

WE HAVE AN APPLICATION FOR A USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE DAYCARE FOR UP TO 10 CHILDREN AS A HOME OCCUPATION IN QUEENS LAKE.

AND I MENTIONED, UH, LAST MONTH, UH, THAT WE HAVE TWO APPLICATIONS FOR THE STOP AND GO CONVENIENCE STORE ON DENBY BOULEVARD.

UM, THESE MIGHT GO FORWARD IN OCTOBER.

I'M STILL NOT SURE YET.

UH, BUT ONE IS TO, UH, ADD GAS PUMPS TO THE EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE.

AND THE OTHER APPLICATION IS TO ADD A MINI STORAGE WAREHOUSE FACILITY.

UH, BEHIND THE CONVENIENCE STORE.

PROPERTY ACTUALLY GOES BACK, UH, PRETTY FAR.

YOU WOULDN'T KNOW WHAT TO LOOK AT IT, BUT IT GOES BACK PRETTY FAR.

UM, WE WERE GONNA TAKE OUR, UH, COMMISSION PHOTO, UH, BEFORE THE MEETING.

WE DIDN'T, DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO DO THAT.

I WOULD ASK IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND STAYING BEHIND FOR TWO MINUTES SO WE CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT IMPORTANT TASK.

UH, AND LAST BUT DEFINITELY NOT LEAST, I WANT TO CONGRATULATE EARL ANDERSON, WHO IS THE COUNTY'S NEW CHIEF OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

WOW.

THE, UH, WELL, WELL, WELL DESERVED PROMOTION.

UH, HE'S BEEN WITH US 19 YEARS NOW, 19 PLUS, UH, YEARS NOW.

AND SO THIS IS A BIG, UH, STEP UP.

SO, UH, CONGRATULATIONS.

CONGRATULATIONS.

VERY GOOD.

CONGRATULATIONS.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

MR. CHAIRMAN.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

[10. Committee Reports]

UH, ANY COMMITTEE REPORTS? WE HEARD? NONE.

UH, AT THIS TIME I WILL MOVE TO ADJOURNMENT.

THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.